From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 19:38:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4693A1065674 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.smith@futurecis.com) Received: from mail1.futurecis.com (static-72-66-21-14.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.21.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E867A8FC32 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey.smith@futurecis.com) Received: (qmail 41975 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2008 19:38:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.0.97]) ([10.0.0.97]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.futurecis.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Apr 2008 19:38:32 -0000 From: Jeffrey Smith To: Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <20080421123038.42988gk2kqfgng0g@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <1208720979.2082.13.camel@mrwizard.futurecis.com> <20080421123038.42988gk2kqfgng0g@webmail.leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FutureCIS Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:38:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1208806688.2082.23.camel@mrwizard.futurecis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update on jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:38:29 -0000 On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 12:30 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Jeffrey Smith (from Sun, 20 Apr > 2008 15:49:39 -0400): > > > I previously posted a howto to use zfs to manage jails. The first > > update through freebsd-update has been released. Testing this I get > [snip] > > But I still get that same error. Does anyone have any idea what would > > keep this from working? If there is a way to update the host and all > > subsequent jails vi the host that would be great, as i would prefer not > > to allow chflags from within the jails. > > If you have your jail on ZFS I suggest you check that the original > file has flags at all. I doubt it (as ZFS doesn't handle flags (yet?)). > > Bye, > Alexander. > Right, I think I rememeber reading that somewhere. Is there a work around so freebsd-update will work, or am I out of luck until ZFS is fixed?