From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 10 17:31:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5A2B1B; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC1893C; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1AHVofD077328; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:31:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r1AHVoK7077327; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:31:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:31:50 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 7+ days of dogfood Message-ID: <20130210173150.GA77296@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20130210000723.GA73630@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5117A319.60804@passap.ru> <20130210164424.GA77092@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Boris Samorodov X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:31:50 -0000 On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:05:22AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 10 February 2013 08:44, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > Without it, the build infrastructure was selecting -march=i486, > > which produced even worse results. Several ports would not > > compile because llvm's integrated assembler was given invalid > > assembly constructs. > > Have you submitted bugs? :) > No. At the time, I was more concerned with returning my laptop to some functioning form than worrying about why building xfig was dying with an invalid assembly instruction. I also don't see a point in submitting a bug report of the form 'Firefox dies with a segfault after 10 seconds' when I can obtain no other useful information. In particular, bin/112408 suggests a bug report about firefox would be enshrined in the PR database. -- Steve