From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 26 0:25:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DB337B401; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:25:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gid.co.uk [194.32.164.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68DE43FD7; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:25:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1Q8POH51170; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:25:24 GMT (envelope-from rb) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030226082316.03709d98@gid.co.uk> X-Sender: rbmail@gid.co.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:25:24 +0000 To: Robert Watson From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: Jdk13/14 still hangs in 4.8 Prerelease. Outstanding Fix need (fwd) Cc: John Baldwin , Martin Blapp , re@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, At 22:01 25/2/03, Robert Watson wrote: >[...] >I would oppose simply enabling the current CANSIGNAL check -- it >has serious problems. On the other hand, putting in a refined check >sounds reasonable and I'd be happy to review such a patch. Although the >code from 5.x won't instantly work with 4.x without substantial >modification, it might make a good starting point. OK, so what's the score with the patch at the end of the kern/40611 audit trail? Thanks -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 989 4254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message