From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 6 14:38:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ohm.physics.purdue.edu (ohm.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.146.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC4337B719; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 14:38:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@physics.purdue.edu) Received: (from will@localhost) by ohm.physics.purdue.edu (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f26MeFp40060; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:40:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from will@physics.purdue.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: ohm.physics.purdue.edu: will set sender to will@physics.purdue.edu using -f Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:40:15 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: make(1) benchmarks [WAS: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as Makefile.inc0 ...] Message-ID: <20010306174015.V31975@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Maxim Sobolev , FreeBSD Current References: <200102271125.f1RBPig49632@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010227150929.B72398@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010228102308.K767@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> <200102281651.f1SGp8d41759@harmony.village.org> <20010228123542.N767@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> <3AA52E6F.F660E94B@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="30GLzS1nLAWfoGxm" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AA52E6F.F660E94B@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 08:37:35PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --30GLzS1nLAWfoGxm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Any updates? My quick test involving running pkg_version on a system with= 92 > installed ports, which is very make-intensive operation if ports have ori= gin > recorded, as pkg_version(1) runs `make -V' for each port, shown that > statically-compiled make is about 15% faster than dynamically-compiled. S= ound like a > reasonable speed gain for 100k binary size increase. What do people think? Err, sorry, I forgot to do it on the weekend, and have no time right now. Next weekend I will (but someone probably needs to remind me). --=20 wca --30GLzS1nLAWfoGxm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6pWdPF47idPgWcsURAm9aAKCDE+nKMwNDuo3tjbNTaBzXPzYNVACeMlD6 WOOnU142z2cJ5hiUozftzm4= =ttlN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --30GLzS1nLAWfoGxm-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message