From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 28 20:08:06 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275B91065689;
	Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bill@lefebvre.org)
Received: from photon.ws-e.net (photon.ws-e.com [64.34.164.166])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66A68FC0A;
	Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bill@lefebvre.org)
Received: from lilburn.lefebvre.org
	(adsl-074-166-023-150.sip.asm.bellsouth.net [74.166.23.150])
	by photon.ws-e.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8SJkqOj026424;
	Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:46:52 GMT
Received: from [10.88.88.6] (milton.lefebvre.org [10.88.88.6])
	by lilburn.lefebvre.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8SJko4d055518;
	Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from bill@lefebvre.org)
Message-ID: <48DFDF25.2090905@lefebvre.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:46:45 -0400
From: William LeFebvre <bill@lefebvre.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>
References: <20080928054620.GA80250@k7.mavetju>	<20080928142409.19f94e5b@anthesphoria.net>
	<20080928193825.GC87069@icarus.home.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20080928193825.GC87069@icarus.home.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed
	version=3.2.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on lilburn.lefebvre.org
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 192.168.0.4
Cc: FreeBSD-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org,
	Nikola Le??i?? <nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net>,
	Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Request for testing - top 3.8b1 in the base system
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:08:06 -0000

Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:24:09PM +0200, Nikola Le??i?? wrote:

>> Is it normal to have 100.64% for cc1?
> 
> I would assume so, as your machine has more than one logical or
> physical processor.
> 

No, that was a per-thread display he posted.  Altho undesirable I can 
come up with some plausible reasons why it is exceeding 100%, all 
related to the uncertainty of trying to perform accurate measurements on 
a moving target.  I suppose I could cap the percentage at 100 just for 
aesthetic reasons, and to keep it from overflowing the column.

Bill