From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Sep 18 06:00:57 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA21970
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 06:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from alcatel.fr (news.alcatel.fr [194.133.58.131])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA21965
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 06:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr)
From: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr
Received: from alcatel.fr (gatekeeper-ssn.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.244])
        by mailgate.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id PAA30282;
        Fri, 18 Sep 1998 15:06:08 +0200
Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65])
        by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id OAA01318;
        Fri, 18 Sep 1998 14:59:33 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4])
	by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA02312;
	Fri, 18 Sep 1998 14:59:18 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from eole.telspace.alcatel.fr by telss1 (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA19551; Fri, 18 Sep 98 14:59:02 +0200
Received: from localhost by eole.telspace.alcatel.fr with SMTP
	(1.40.112.12/16.2) id AA258583188; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 14:53:08 +0200
X-Openmail-Hops: 1
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 98 14:52:59 +0200
Message-Id: <H000057c01859412@MHS>
In-Reply-To: <199809181252.IAA12335@lafcol>
Subject: Re: lkm/cd9660
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: knollm@lafcol.lafayette.edu
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="Re:"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Re:"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Gd'day

I understand you can't buildworld *AT ALL* : even without the -j flag /
or am I wrong ?

	TfH

> Yes, I discovered last night, going from 2.2.7-release to -stable fails
if
> I use the -j option.  Although, it failed on 'lkm/ccd'  when I tried to
> retest the theory and run it again with -j4.
> 
> Mike
> 
> At 09:46 AM 9/18/98 +0200, you wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I'm in a very similar situation : I'm loosely tracking stable on my
home
> >machine (cvsupping every other week). And I can't buildworld with more
> >than one process (ie : make -j 2 buildworld chokes on the same point
as
> >you lkm/cd9660).
> >
> >BUT  make buildworld (no -j options) goes to the end of the
compilation
> >and linking operations.
> >
> >I haven't reconfig'd and rebuilt my kernel recently : could this be a
> >cause of my problems ?
> >
> >	TfH
> >
> >> I've been trying to upgrade from 2.2.7-release to -stable, and I
> >haven't
> >> been able to 'make world' for a week.  It fails on lkm/cd9660.
> >> 
> >> How do I fix this?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mike
> >>
> >
> >[big snip]
> >
> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> > 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message