From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jan 29 20:49:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from marius.org (marius.org [216.88.115.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C30537B402 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from marius@localhost) by marius.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f0U4moX15272; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:48:50 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:48:50 -0600 From: Marius Strom To: Richard Ward Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9.1 woes Message-ID: <20010129224850.M388@marius.org> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Ward , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <00c901c08a66$5f1ce3c0$0101a8c0@pavilion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <00c901c08a66$5f1ce3c0$0101a8c0@pavilion>; from mh@neonsky.net on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:43:03PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to bind-9.1.0/README: On FreeBSD systems, the server logs error messages like "fcntl(8, F_SETFL, 4): Inappropriate ioctl for device". This is due to a bug in the FreeBSD /dev/random device. The bug has been reported to the FreeBSD maintainers. Versions of OpenBSD prior to 2.8 have a similar problem. As far as your -g question, it seems -g support has been deprecated, although I can't find any confirmation of this in BIND9 docs. The new functionality of -g is to (according to the new manpage): -g run named in the foreground and force all logging to stderr. On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:43:03PM -0500, Richard Ward wrote: > I just downloaded the BIND 9.1 tarball after hearing about the chaos with previous versions. I did run into something odd that I can't quite figure out, it's also mentioned in the 9.1 documentation and I'm sure some one knows the answer. I managed to start BIND fine, yet digging through the logs I ran into this line that makes me wonder. > > entropy.c:948: unexpected error: > fcntl(8, F_SETFL, 4): Inappropriate ioctl for device > > Could some one shed light on this "problem"? Also, when trying to start BIND 9.1, it will start fine as 'named -g', though when I try to 'named -u bind -g bind' (so it runs as that user/group) it doesn't launch to the background, and fails to start period. Any ideas? (Sorry for all the questions, I just moved from 8.X and am still getting used to the changes/features) > > Thanks. > Richard Ward > mh@maKintosh.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > -- Marius Strom Professional Geek/Unix System Administrator URL: http://www.marius.org/ http://www.marius.org/marius.pgp 0x55DE53E4 "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a mini-van full of DLT tapes traveling down the highway at 65 miles per hour..." -Andrew Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message