From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 6 11:44:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8731504D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 11:44:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bsdx@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28223; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:44:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:44:42 -0500 (EST) From: Adam To: jimmy martin Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Nmap... In-Reply-To: <200001061923.OAA20333@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> So I checked my kernel to make sure bpf was there and... >> >> # The 'bpfilter' pseudo-device enable the Berkeley Packet Filter. >> # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! >> # The number of devices determines the maximum number of >> # simultaneous BPF clients programs runnable. >> pseudo-device bpfilter 1 #Berkeley packet filter >> >> So it appears to be there. Any Ideas why my nmap wont work? It looks like you have only 1 bpf supported in the kernel and some program is probably already using it. dhcp client? arpwatch? trafshow? tcpdump? Anything else that uses bpf will take the first available bpf. If you need more than one at once, increase the number in the kernel and make sure you have enough bpf devices in /dev. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message