From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jan 20 08:38:43 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA10535
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 20 Jan 1997 08:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freenet.hamilton.on.ca (0@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca [199.212.94.65])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA10510
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 1997 08:38:33 -0800 (PST)
From: hoek@freenet.hamilton.on.ca
Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca [199.212.94.66]) by freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA14211; Mon, 20 Jan 1997 11:38:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA01958; Mon, 20 Jan 1997 11:40:30 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 11:40:30 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199701201640.LAA01958@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca>
X-Mailer: slnr v.2.13 as ported to FreeBSD
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
cc: dennis@etinc.com, hackers@freebsd.org, Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Subject: Re: Commerical applications (was: Development and validation
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In Email, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> wrote:
> 
> Selachii:	"The actual statement was ``a premature move to elf'', the
> 	         context of which makes it quite clear that any assumption of
> 		 maturity, or lack thereof, refers entirely to the action of
> 		 movement, or in this case the merging of code, rests entirely
> 		 with the speed or pace at which this action is carried out
> 		 and does not, in fact, make any assumptions or claims
> 		 concerning the actual maturity level of the ELF software
> 		 itself."

Shouldn't "rests" be changed to "resting" to make this a comprehendable 
and grammatically correct sentence?


-- 
tIM...HOEk
"The approach is in error; it is bad engineering methodology."
                              - Terry Lambert.