Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Jul 2004 10:51:00 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: some PRs
Message-ID:  <20040718175100.GA27990@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040718165142.GA17142@khazad.dyndns.org>
References:  <20040716220848.A35405@armor.freesurf.fr> <20040718031554.GF1070@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040718133330.GA21009@khazad.dyndns.org> <20040718151649.GA53675@gothmog.gr> <20040718165142.GA17142@khazad.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:51:42PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:16:49PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > On 2004-07-18 15:33, Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think it's useful for compatibility.
> >=20
> > In general, I'm not against compatibility.  However, what's the end of
> > this route?  To create one special device node in /dev for every
> > possible errno value? :-(
>=20
> I don't claim that /dev/full is useful just for the sake of it. Your argu=
ment
> (that having a device just for each errno value is silly) is something I
> basicaly agree with.
>=20
> But if some applications depend on it, it's still helpful for portability.
> I don't know what support for native compatibility is expected or planned=
 for
> FreeBSD, but I know you have a Ports Collection with thousands of package=
s,
> and this might minimaly reduce the work of your port maintainers. IMHO, y=
ou
> should ask the people working in the Ports Collection for their opinion b=
efore
> taking a decision.
>=20
> (Note this patch comes from the context of the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD porting
> effort, in which we port Debian GNU/Linux packages, which are a bit more
> likely to introduce Linuxisms than the average candidate for FreeBSD Port=
s.
> Thus, our requirements might differ somewhat.)

There's no mention of /dev/full in the build logs (e.g. configure
script output) of any of the 11000-odd ports in the ports collection.

Kris



--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFA+riEWry0BWjoQKURAtwaAKD/c9VAiA791uSCbAegSlIhatiYewCg0dXz
1TIldHrg41/8zUK/INE1TnA=
=txr6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040718175100.GA27990>