Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:26:41 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: ruby gems, use ports or not? Message-ID: <44E1CB91.5070301@digitaltorque.ca>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig33FD7715563474A1295F73AB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For anyone else admining a FreeBSD box running Ruby, I'm curious as to whether you're managing gems via ports or the gems system. I installed Rails via ports, but I think I'd prefer to just use the gems interface. What is everyone else doing? Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --------------enig33FD7715563474A1295F73AB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE4cuWKGqCc1vIvggRAmtEAJ9bzgWDRSGbAGlugZwVm0q0GTGxjACfQsPe /DMOBOAon4QkoFaeOFtrg3g= =2uQm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig33FD7715563474A1295F73AB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44E1CB91.5070301>