From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 30 16:40:15 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4744B16A41F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:40:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916EE43D58
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:40:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: (qmail 27150 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2005 16:40:13 -0000
Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org)
	([66.92.78.145])
	(envelope-sender <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>)
	by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; 30 Nov 2005 16:40:13 -0000
Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id B76A12841D; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:40:12 -0500 (EST)
Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <60336.192.168.3.69.1133319528.squirrel@webmail.proficuous.com>
	<438D1894.90500@mac.com>
	<63871.192.168.3.69.1133320948.squirrel@webmail.proficuous.com>
	<438D1D95.7010503@mac.com>
	<65229.192.168.3.69.1133323019.squirrel@webmail.proficuous.com>
	<20051130125225.GJ27673@merkur.atekomi.net>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Date: 30 Nov 2005 11:40:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20051130125225.GJ27673@merkur.atekomi.net>
Message-ID: <44zmnm2ioj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: pf blocking nfs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:40:15 -0000

Will Maier <willmaier@ml1.net> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:56:59PM -0600, Aaron P. Martinez wrote:
> > > Aaron P. Martinez wrote:
> [...]
> > I realize i could just accept all udp packets from the NFS server or even
> > just ports 2049, but the underlying question is, why isn't my "keep state"
> > rule handling this.
> 
> I don't use pf (or NFS), but UDP is a stateless protocol. I wouldn't
> be surprised if pf couldn't keep track of its state...

No, that's a big part of *why* you want pf to keep track of its state.