From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 05:02:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F0B16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 05:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BAD43D31 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 05:02:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 776B6530A; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:02:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id D07B55309; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:02:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 5DBDF33C90; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:02:32 +0100 (CET) To: Andreas Hauser References: <20031210061329.GD13539@afflictions.org> <20031210204642.27989.qmail@paladin.fortunaty.net> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:02:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20031210204642.27989.qmail@paladin.fortunaty.net> (Andreas Hauser's message of "10 Dec 2003 20:46:42 -0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: Damian Gerow cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld doesn't like -O2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:02:43 -0000 Andreas Hauser writes: > There is a qr about it > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D55774 > but it was closed by DES saying "Not a problem report". > I don't understand why [...] Quoting from src/share/examples/etc/make.conf: # CFLAGS controls the compiler settings used when compiling C code. # Note that optimization settings above -O (-O2, ...) are not recommended # or supported for compiling the world or the kernel - please revert any # nonstandard optimization settings to "-O" before submitting bug reports # to the developers. Even if that weren't the case, PRs about a broken build are generally not welcome. We have mailing lists for that. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no