From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 7 21:08:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CDFC1EB; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [212.87.224.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C3018F5; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [212.87.224.105]) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s17KnSgn082855; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:49:28 GMT (envelope-from wkoszek@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: (from wkoszek@localhost) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id s17KnSBe082854; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:49:28 GMT (envelope-from wkoszek) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:49:28 +0000 From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" To: Juergen Lock Subject: Re: linux libusb again, I made an updated port... Message-ID: <20140207204928.GD12994@FreeBSD.org> References: <20140207201208.GA59695@enceladus10.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20140207201208.GA59695@enceladus10.kn-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on freebsd.czest.pl X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (freebsd.czest.pl [212.87.224.105]); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 21:08:10 -0000 On pią, lut 07, 2014 at 09:12:08 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > Hi! > > This came up on irc so I tried to build a linux libusb port (before > I learned about ports/146895), mine uses linux_base-gentoo-stage3 > like linux_kdump with a src/lib/libusb head snapshot so it's more > up to date than wkoszek's build (ports/146895), and it's really > easy to update it again. Also maybe it can be used as linux > libusb-1.0.so too; I didn't actually test it tho. > > Should this be committed? Is wkoszek's version better since it > also builds on < 10.x? Comments welcome... > > wkoszek's version: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146895 > > Mine: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/linux_libusb.shar > > Distfile: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/distfiles/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.tar.bz2 > > 10/amd64 package: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/packages/10amd64/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.txz > > (built via: > > poudriere bulk -v -j 10amd64 -p custom devel/linux_libusb > > - btw for some reason the dependency emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 > doesn't build for 10i386 in poudriere bulk, I get a pkg segfault. bapt > Cc'd...) > Juergen, What would be the reason for this update? My stuff may be out of date, but it was all tested and working. I verified it with Linux'ish lsusb(1) and USB-based FPGA JTAG programmer, for which this stuff was written. Can you show the diff between USB code from src/lib and from the distfile? Instead of having a port with .c code, I'd drive towards having src/lib changes (if any) be commited. And then that port only has to do: cp -rf src/lib/libusb port/tmp/dir and build it with different -DDEFINES if necessary. Thanks, -- Wojciech A. Koszek wkoszek@FreeBSD.czest.pl http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/~wkoszek/