From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 7 10:12:50 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA04457 for current-outgoing; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 10:12:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA04450 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 10:12:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA03488; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 18:11:43 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: "Garrett A. Wollman" cc: Julian Elischer , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysctl status right now, and plea for testing. In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 1995 11:55:18 EST." <9512071655.AA11802@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 1995 19:11:43 +0100 Message-ID: <3486.818359903@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I don't quite understand how devconf and sysctl go together.. > > do they? > > Well, they do and they don't. Poul-Henning doesn't like the way I > designed devconf, and if I don't do something quickly he'll probably > break it completely and add his own thing. This is a needless > duplication of effort. Well my detailed position on this has been moved to a discussion in core now. The short version of my position for the (probably few) remaining readers of this thread is that Garrett has abandoned the devconf stuff so long, have given no docs of any kind and no help after repeated requests that I consider the code dead. As to the merit of the actual design, I cannot judge. If I had either doc or working code I could decide, until then though, it's just dead code for me. I generally am in favour of removing dead code. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.