From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 16 8:52:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from iglou.com (iglou4.iglou.com [192.107.41.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFD61540E for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 08:51:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patrick@cre8tivegroup.com) Received: from [204.255.227.145] (helo=gateway.cre8tivegroup.com) by iglou.com with esmtp (8.9.1/8.9.1) id 10Mx3R-0002vE-00; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 11:50:58 -0500 Content-Length: 742 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <36EE5DF0.E22D5B8D@fernuni-hagen.de> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 11:50:48 -0000 (GMT) From: Patrick Gardella To: "F. Heinrichmeyer" , To: "F. Heinrichmeyer" , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: here are the patched files for Joliet-FS and 3.1-RELEASE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 16-Mar-99 F. Heinrichmeyer wrote: > http://es-i2.fernuni-hagen.de/~jfh/FreeBSD_Documentation/3.1-joliet.patch.tar. > gz Help me out here (so I can better understand the FreeBSD development system)... Why haven't these been committed to the source? Are they still to unstable to be used? Patches have been in existance since 11/14/97 (pr kern/5038). Is this becuase no one has the time, or no one wants to commit the patches until they know they don't break anything else? No blame is being intended. I'm just curious... --- Patrick S. Gardella Director of Web Development The Creative Group 1-800-804-0783 ext 29 606-858-8029 (fax) http://www.cre8tivegroup.com PGP Key ID 0xEE2D47A9 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message