From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Jul 8 02:43:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9533D995577 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 02:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@me.com) Received: from mr11p00im-asmtp001.me.com (mr11p00im-asmtp001.me.com [17.110.69.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC6411FF; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 02:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@me.com) Received: from me.com (c-73-162-13-215.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.162.13.215]) by mr11p00im-asmtp001.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Mar 31 2015)) with ESMTPSA id <0NR500H94E86C100@mr11p00im-asmtp001.me.com>; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 02:43:19 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-07-08_02:2015-07-07,2015-07-08,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000 definitions=main-1507080044 From: Rui Paulo To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: Adrian Chadd , Konstantin Belousov Subject: Re: CFT/CFR: NUMA policy branch Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:43:18 -0700 Message-id: <2926903.YAk7qUEGf9@akita> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/11.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-reply-to: References: <20150707093747.GE2080@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7Bit Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 02:43:27 -0000 On Tuesday 07 July 2015 15:53:18 Adrian Chadd wrote: > > I did not read further, the patch is half-done at best. > > That's lovely. Meanwhile, people are actively using this thing. It may not be perfect, but it's way more than half done. You might object to introducing the syscalls, but procctl is still annoyingly limited. -- Rui Paulo