Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:43:18 -0700 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: CFT/CFR: NUMA policy branch Message-ID: <2926903.YAk7qUEGf9@akita> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomE4a3R59vbDbZBFcngKOEyNfLs43HW6S_KMbJbxEZHCw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmo=SnqXTF5m65haKqrVf699zinyXs%2BQdvR6V88CW7vooCw@mail.gmail.com> <20150707093747.GE2080@kib.kiev.ua> <CAJ-VmomE4a3R59vbDbZBFcngKOEyNfLs43HW6S_KMbJbxEZHCw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 07 July 2015 15:53:18 Adrian Chadd wrote: > > I did not read further, the patch is half-done at best. > > That's lovely. Meanwhile, people are actively using this thing. It may not be perfect, but it's way more than half done. You might object to introducing the syscalls, but procctl is still annoyingly limited. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2926903.YAk7qUEGf9>