From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  6 21:27:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D0CF216A4CE; Mon,  6 Dec 2004 21:27:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mx.hostarica.com (mx.hostarica.com [196.40.45.74])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 60CF543D54; Mon,  6 Dec 2004 21:27:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jose@hostarica.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost.hostarica.com [127.0.0.1])
	by mx.hostarica.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AF7F6A1;
	Mon,  6 Dec 2004 15:28:49 -0600 (CST)
Received: from jose.hostarica.net (unknown [192.168.0.69])
	by mx.hostarica.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A4AF6A0;
	Mon,  6 Dec 2004 15:28:47 -0600 (CST)
From: Jose Hidalgo Herrera <jose@hostarica.net>
To: martes.wigglesworth@us.army.mil
In-Reply-To: <1102352460.675.70.camel@Mobile1.276NET>
References: <1102347832.675.41.camel@Mobile1.276NET>
	 <1102350903.43918.5.camel@jose.hostarica.net>
	 <1102352460.675.70.camel@Mobile1.276NET>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MGOpuCowy6amkGcuGtIz"
Organization: Corp. Hostarica
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:27:17 -0600
Message-Id: <1102368437.77087.6.camel@jose.hostarica.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 0.1
cc: ipfw-mailings <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
cc: newbies freebsd list <freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org>
cc: jose@hostarica.com
cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Weird lockup of network traffic...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jose@hostarica.com
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:27:26 -0000


--=-MGOpuCowy6amkGcuGtIz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If you really thing its a buffer[1] problem try:
	netstat -m
	netstat -sfinet=20

And if you find problems recompile with:

options         NMBCLUSTERS=3D<higher value>

man mbuf

[1]: mbuf clusters exhausted


My 2 cents with the information given.


El lun, 06-12-2004 a las 20:01 +0300, martes wigglesworth escribi=F3:
> I only listed the rules that are relivant to my assumption, hence the
> listing of the pipes.  My inquiry was primarily to try to figure out
> what was cousing the routing table glich, or whatever was cousing the
> pings, and all other traffic, to be dumped, prior to being transmitted.=20
> I have another firewall, behind this rate limiter, so if you could give
> any assistance with the buffer errors, it would  be most appreciated. =20
--=20
Jose Hidalgo Herrera <jose@hostarica.net>
Corp. Hostarica

--=-MGOpuCowy6amkGcuGtIz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada
	digitalmente

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBtM61Mb674RVSRIARAu69AKCFzYi6OSdhh7oj/FbZbGjDx2YZwQCdH3AF
DwFrj/+L+m3vtBJQxEH3gHc=
=c4TX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-MGOpuCowy6amkGcuGtIz--