From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 20 19:55:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759F21065676 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D1A8FC13 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 19:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A179CB08E; Thu, 20 May 2010 21:52:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K03YMJIBU03b; Thu, 20 May 2010 21:52:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9129CB1AA; Thu, 20 May 2010 21:52:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o4KJqW9N070947; Thu, 20 May 2010 21:52:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 21:52:32 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: ambrosehuang ambrose Message-ID: <20100520195232.GA70802@freebsd.org> References: <20100520072120.GA36958@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clangBSD build error X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 19:55:47 -0000 On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:10:23PM +0800, ambrosehuang ambrose wrote: > I found my clang version is : > [root@lateaxfreebsd src]# clang --version > clang version 2.0 (trunk) > Target: *x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.0* > Thread model: posix > svn revision is r10379_1 in PORTS > > I think maybe you can use the llvm-devel in PORTS to reproduce this > > I try to update clang to the latest version with > make BOOTSTRAP=1 _CKSUMFILES="", but it seems the patch file confilcts with > latest code? > > Could you tell me how to bypass the patching step ? there's no point in upgrading to newer clang. there were no change in this.. are you sure you are compiling with llvm-devel the malloc.c in clangbsd? not some older/newer version?