From owner-freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Mon Sep 3 14:05:20 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41657FEAE75 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 14:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de) Received: from umail2.aei.mpg.de (umail2.aei.mpg.de [194.94.224.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7C6A860E1 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 14:05:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de) Received: from mailgate.aei.mpg.de (mailgate.aei.mpg.de [194.94.224.5]) by umail2.aei.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC322089C8F; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailgate.aei.mpg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id CFA9D406ADE; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from intranet.aei.uni-hannover.de (ahin1.aei.uni-hannover.de [130.75.117.40]) by mailgate.aei.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3AD406ADB; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from arc.aei.uni-hannover.de ([130.75.117.1]) by intranet.aei.uni-hannover.de (IBM Domino Release 9.0.1FP8) with ESMTP id 2018090316051620-189393 ; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:05:16 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:05:17 +0200 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: nut/apc values sparse after update to 11.2 Message-Id: <20180903160517.e443ef89ce9564c0fec5122d@aei.mpg.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20180903150854.6bd6052d5c1a8c02e539509d@aei.mpg.de> Organization: Max Planck Gesellschaft X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on intranet/aei-hannover(Release 9.0.1FP8|February 23, 2017) at 03/09/2018 16:05:16, Serialize by Router on intranet/aei-hannover(Release 9.0.1FP8|February 23, 2017) at 03/09/2018 16:05:16, Serialize complete at 03/09/2018 16:05:16 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-PMX-Version: 6.0.2.2308539, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2018.9.3.135415 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=' HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, MIME_LOWER_CASE 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1200_1299 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, IN_REP_TO 0, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0, MSG_THREAD 0, MULTIPLE_REAL_RCPTS 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __DQ_NEG_HEUR 0, __DQ_NEG_IP 0, __HAS_CC_HDR 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __INVOICE_MULTILINGUAL 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJ_PREDICATE 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __SUBJ_REPLY 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NAME 0, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __TO_REAL_NAMES 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS ' X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 14:05:20 -0000 On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:37:18 +0200 Hans Petter Selasky wrote about Re: nut/apc values sparse after update to 11.2: > Did you check the permissions for the USB device? Yes, they should be fine: --- # ll /dev/uhid0 crw-r----- 1 uucp uucp 0xde Sep 3 15:40 /dev/uhid0 --- > Did you try to re-attach the USB device? Yes, doesn't change anything: --- # dmesg|grep uhid0 uhid0 on uhub3 uhid0: on usbus1 uhid0: detached uhid0 on uhub3 uhid0: on usbus1 uhid0: detached uhid0 on uhub3 uhid0: on usbus1 --- > What does usbconfig output? Does it detect your device? Yes, it does (otherwise it wouldn't work at all, I guess?): --- # usbconfig|grep American ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON (2mA) --- > Did you try a 11-stable kernel? No, should I? Running -stable on that machine would be tedious. cu Gerrit