From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Feb 28 14:02:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3014AB62A6 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E407A12B8 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1SE22Qj089617 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:02:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 207530] net-mgmt/super_mediator Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:02:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rakuco@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:02:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207530 Raphael Kubo da Costa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |easy, needs-qa, patch Status|New |Open CC| |rakuco@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- Thanks for the contribution. Can you please adjust the following: - Set a more descriptive title for the bug. New ports generally have the following format: "[new port] category/portname: ". - Set the "maintainer-flag+" flag in your attachment so that it shows up in= the "Ports: Maintainer Approved" saved search in Bugzilla. - Regenerate your new port using shar instead of a tarball, as described he= re: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.htm= l#porting-submitting As for the port itself, I suggest you run portlint -AC on it. There are ext= ra empty lines, lack of tabs in some places and stale comments that could be removed (like the "PKG_DEPENDS" ones). It also help you post here the results of calling "portlint -AC" and one or more Poudriere build results. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=