From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jul 21 10:31:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD0E37B400 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CD943E58 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:31:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6LHV5XZ028670; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:31:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost) by happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6LHV0J3028669; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:31:00 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:31:00 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Fernando Gleiser Cc: "Andrew L. Neporada" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: compiling world with -g Message-ID: <20020721173100.GB28543@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> References: <20020720180857.GA21316@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> <20020721122553.C23888-100000@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020721122553.C23888-100000@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:29:28PM -0300, Fernando Gleiser wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Andrew L. Neporada wrote: > > > Will it take any additional resources to run world compiled with "CFLAGS= -O -pipe -g" > > (except some additional disk space usage)? > > Maybe it has changed now, but I remember that some time ago > optimization (-O) and debugging symbols (-g) didn't mix well. The programs > ran fine, but you would get some weird results from the debugger. > That hasn't been the case since about the early 1990's, if you've been using gcc. Possibly earlier. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way Tel: +44 1628 476614 Marlow Fax: +44 0870 0522645 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message