Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:06:20 +0100
From:      Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To:        ??????? ??????? <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/156770: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch]: performance improvement and several extensions
Message-ID:  <20120128170620.GA24446@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
In-Reply-To: <201201281600.q0SG0SNP036270@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <201201281600.q0SG0SNP036270@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 04:00:28PM +0000, ??????? ??????? wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/156770; it has been noted by GNATS.
> 
> From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, alter@alter.org.ua
> Cc:  
> Subject: Re: kern/156770: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch]: performance improvement and several extensions
> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:58:56 +0200
> 
>  Hi, Team.
>  
>  Do you plan to port this patch to FreeBSD-10 or 9?
>  It will be veri nice
>  
>  especially this feature:
>   # it is possible to use bmap instead of port list. It gives performance benefit when you have large list of services. Lookup time doesn't depend on list size. Rather useful to QoS game traffic.

not as is. Way too many pieces, many are interesting,
from the description some of them are already in.

If someone can submit smaller patches for the individual
features (such as port maps, fast tags etc) then i can
certainly consider adding some of them.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120128170620.GA24446>