From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 13:37:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9556037B401 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:37:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C883343F85 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:37:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.147.188.198]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with ESMTP id <2003040920374000100ogmd3e>; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:37:40 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h39KbdXf049864; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:37:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h39KbcRJ049861; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:37:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: Ben Rosengart References: <20030407202027.GA32057@narcissus.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 09 Apr 2003 16:37:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030407202027.GA32057@narcissus.net> Message-ID: <44smsrv23y.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stray sshd processes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 20:37:41 -0000 Ben Rosengart writes: > Hello, > I'm running STABLE as of about a month ago. I have a shell user whose > ssh connection is sometimes disconnected by a firewall between her > network and mine. When this happens, the privileged sshd child for her > session does not terminate. Once a number of them equal to "MaxStartups" > accumulates, new connections cannot be made, which is annoying, to say > the least. > > Has anyone else seen this? Any idea what the story is? The firewall probably drops everything for the session afterwards. Adding keepalives would probably help...