Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 10:56:42 +0100 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads models and FreeBSD / Threads goals version II Message-ID: <381D63DA.EE8DD41F@scc.nl> References: <199911010347.WAA20149@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, <199911010412.VAA14975@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote: > > No, I want to be able to have multiple threads in a single process > > be in kernel space. Only one can be running, but others can be > > blocked. > > Agreed. My point is that if we allow multiple threads in a single > process in the kernel space, it's alot worse than the present tsleep > issues.... From rev 2: 2/ Ability to simultaneously schedule M threads over N Processors. I interpret this as "allow multiple threads from a single process to run concurrently on different processors". Without restriction, this implies that they may run in kernel space simultaneously. It should be perfectly clear what we mean, because I fear inconsistencies. -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:marcel@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?381D63DA.EE8DD41F>