Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:22:14 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg> To: Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de> Cc: tom.schutter@gmail.com, phantom@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linking libjava.so RPATH problem Message-ID: <20050707092214.GA4093@sinanica.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <20050707103942.0f3adf42.corecode@fs.ei.tum.de> References: <af36cf9705070514554e26356d@mail.gmail.com> <20050706054753.GA69973@sinanica.bg.datamax> <af36cf9705070609291c3db58d@mail.gmail.com> <20050707060914.GA3480@sinanica.bg.datamax> <20050707103942.0f3adf42.corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:39:42AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > Lately Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg> said: > > > 1) Does the fact that the linker does not realize that the libraries > > > have already been found indicate a bug in the linker? If so, how do I > > > best report it? > > I cannot think of any sensible reason for this behavior, so I guess it > > would be good if it can be "fixed" without breaking something else :) > > You best report it by creating a patch and using send-pr(1) to submit > > it. > > I don't think this is breakage: same soname doesn't account for same > binary, especially if rpath is used. Rpath explicitly states "i (the > elf object) want the libs from this path first", not "for me and > descendants, search this path first". At least that's what I expect it > to do. > I agree. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCzPRGFw6SP/bBpCARAkvuAJ0bJKk898ToHSZ6HE4pYgjJ6DpYdQCfR4AM W55S6H2A8GQTthdajgEeX+I= =A4QT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050707092214.GA4093>