From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 26 14:48:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C2316A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from munk.nu (mail.munk.nu [213.152.51.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9902B43FDD for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:48:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from munk@munk.nu) Received: from munk by munk.nu with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1AP8SE-000A8I-2Z for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:48:14 +0000 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:48:14 +0000 From: Jez Hancock To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20031126224814.GA37786@users.munk.nu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: User Munk Subject: Re: web log and bandwidth usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:48:20 -0000 On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 07:22:56PM -0800, Will Prater wrote: > What might be some of the better choices for web log analysis as well? > I use to use analog. awstats is a nice alternative to analog and webalizer - although it does give more detailed reports, it also takes longer to process logfiles (about 10 seconds for 20,000 entries on an amd 650 512mb ram) - see the homepage at: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/ there is more info on pros/cons there. -- Jez Hancock - System Administrator / PHP Developer http://munk.nu/