From nobody Sat Sep 20 08:31:44 2025 X-Original-To: java@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id 4cTMzv4T3vz68Tjh for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from haraldei@anduin.net) Received: from mail.anduin.net (mail.anduin.net [185.42.170.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 4cTMzv2Qd7z3sXq for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from haraldei@anduin.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anduin.net; s=dkim2021; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dcuzUzPlXlCL8mmzFrhhBIK1CT5NxxLjyw4fm/SRhJc=; t=1758357115; x=1759221115; b=vAqlWNc/CLBrHpoE1CoSbOTn598w6EN0gxRsKiUsOwUIfGUAk3lzwVwOYRi1igLM4Dj68TpEa5a WMYytYR3JsYQL31r+qRLMGyGBi1LNDAcl4WN4nzkO1Yw7Souo0UiPt5O7fge1qq3FMugMaxWjgEKl S5RMQNmczcIxOzJgGfwgIYyP4wOOSYoKw+K/SLABQ2NMGfBOmw6LWUMv7RIBbXkS5G9YRDV76Mahh 4ymUEkiPM7s5hpb65NTwUXHn3ov9LTnMIiSrnYntaJGYl72HdTDpmF4eDUuKRkuDz3weGP63X/Wof Mj49UJgHlkJCAdHTVtZRS6pF/XqJZvPRRU/Q==; Received: by mail.anduin.net with utf8esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.98.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1uzt0T-000000002D5-3dXl; Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:31:47 +0000 Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 10:31:44 +0200 From: Harald Eilertsen To: Ronald Klop Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (solved, I think) Re: openjdk build failures on "nm" Message-ID: References: <1330428831.1750.1756980558066@localhost> <2053927433.1876.1757575928041@localhost> <387357483.2815.1757924099539@localhost> <1457853127.243778.1758058293681@localhost> <883854905.286987.1758060251528@localhost> <1330499598.9375.1758291486798@localhost> List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-java List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1330499598.9375.1758291486798@localhost> X-SA-Authenticated: Yes X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: - X-Spam-Report: host: mail.modirum.com | contact: hostmaster@modirum.com | scores: BAYES_00=-1.9,NO_RELAYS=-0.001 | autolearn=no autolearn_force=no, score=0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4cTMzv2Qd7z3sXq On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 04:18:06PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 10:14:59AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > A lot of what we are discovering here was already in java/openjdk8. > Somehow the --with-jobs=${MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER} configure parameter was > lost in java/openjdk11. Ah, that's a good argument for going through all of the ports and consolidating them. I wonder if it could be possible to just make a java/openjdk port, and have the version as a parameter. That would make it a lot easier to keep things in sync. > I'm starting to apply the changes done to openjdk17 to openjdk11 and -18 now. Thanks! Take care! Harald