Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:19:02 -0800 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@FreeBSD.org> To: Guillaume <silencer@free-4ever.net>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cacti system tuning Message-ID: <20061113191902.GJ28339@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20061113013209.GB65089@Geeks.ORG> References: <BAY116-F36203D30F74A7563F7A171C1F60@phx.gbl> <4557988B.4000902@free-4ever.net> <20061113013209.GB65089@Geeks.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:32:09PM -0600, Mike Horwath wrote: > cactid does GREAT on a small number of polls, but seems to *skip* or > *drop* readings on higher than ~1500 polls in my experience. cactid is just rtgpoll (from rtg.sourceforge.net) with a few customizations. unfortunately, the copy is from an old codebase and there are problems in the threading & snmp code from those days. even more unfortunately, rtgpoll development seems to be hopelessly stalled due in part to project mismanagement. > The normal PHP poller handles the 1800+ polls without issue, just > takes 2-3x longer (and still reasonable). it's also much easier to debug problems with either the poller itself or the devices being polled. i'd use the php poller with cacti. -- - bill fumerola / billf@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061113191902.GJ28339>