From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 10:26:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7C916A45F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:26:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31ECD43D66 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:26:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so101866wxc for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 03:26:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S9sk9VHaaNSJWOo3tZ5DFaTAzMO5qdM1XK+8to3CldtVvUi6+QMfRWtfbjoA3dtgaP+m/vIeAmpzSM+jdFE1J9OrJ73wXLo0cQzBzMO4sPEwf4N/386yZC4VPy0TqBLzMoGC7EtBtd6NQZ2EraLb4NpPVxxOD/Hhi9SN18NVLjw= Received: by 10.70.110.4 with SMTP id i4mr920103wxc; Thu, 11 May 2006 03:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.117.13 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 03:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <84dead720605110326t27ccc07ega07bbfae05fb2d3c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:56:15 +0530 From: "Joseph Koshy" To: "R. Tyler Ballance" In-Reply-To: <923FBA2F-24D6-4134-B349-A92666CC6F97@tamu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <923FBA2F-24D6-4134-B349-A92666CC6F97@tamu.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: Xnu, and 'L4BSD' X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:26:24 -0000 > L4Linux exists, but it seems to be more of a means for testing out > and developing the L4 microkernel, but would there be any practical > reason to sandbox the FreeBSD kernel and force it to run as a user- > land service on top of the L4::Pistachio kernel? (for example) Well, you could do neat stuff like migrating VMs between machines 'on-the-fly', as described in the following paper: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/papers/2005-migration-nsdi-pre.= pdf Also, L4::Pistachio is BSD-licensed. --=20 FreeBSD Developer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy