From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 17:50:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9795616A421 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E93643D73 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jANHoKPO079747 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:50:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jANHoKBq079746; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:50:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:50:20 GMT Message-Id: <200511231750.jANHoKBq079746@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Vasil Dimov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vasil Dimov List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:50:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/89415; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vasil Dimov To: Pav Lucistnik Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:49:13 +0200 --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:33:44PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Tool is useful. The patch in the PR isn't, because work needed to commit > it is greater than work needed to recreate it on working copy... Yes, this patch needs more work than running the tool itself. Please close this PR. > Actually I knocked together a simple script that checkouts all ports of > given maintainer without SHA256 sums and run 'make makesum' on them... >=20 > Expect some megacommits soon. :) >=20 Great, remember what Kris said about makesum, that's why I used "sha256 >>" instead of "make makesum": http://lists.FreeBSD.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-November/027239.html --- cut --- * deal with the fact that 'make checksum' on their machine may not add checksums for all of the files listed in distinfo (and in such a case will actually remove them, breaking the port for others) --- cut --- (ofcourse he meant makesum, not checksum) --=20 Vasil Dimov --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFDhKuYFw6SP/bBpCARAhYIAJ9Dqq1s93PCMWpObz4jq7/hv6e+SgCfeH7b dOk1c8J8yLblfpv+m3BZuG4= =oY9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--