From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 31 16:33:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FB9106566B for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:33:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99A28FC16 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CA638E55; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:33:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-76-26-200-187.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [76.26.200.187]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F313330C60; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1N4Gsz-0006eo-00; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:33:05 -0500 Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:33:05 -0500 From: stan To: Robert Joosten Message-ID: <20091031163305.GB25469@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Joosten , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20091031151452.GB23459@teddy.fas.com> <20091031151921.GB15538@ismet.erje.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091031151921.GB15538@ismet.erje.net> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 11:28:02 up 31 days, 18:41, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.05, 0.04 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What VM does FreeBSD run well under X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:33:07 -0000 On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 04:19:21PM +0100, Robert Joosten wrote: > Hi, > > > Which of these does FreebSD run well under? > > It runs okay under virtualbox. > OK, thanks. I tried this a couple of months ago, and had troube witj either OpenBSD, or FrebSD under VirtualBox. Given your commnet, my problems must have been with OpenBSD. -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.