From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Apr 23 19:55: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from kenny.blue-box.net (kenny.blue-box.net [199.2.205.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4C37B9F7 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 19:55:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vince@bendnet.com) Received: from kenny.blue-box.net (kenny.blue-box.net [199.2.205.167]) by kenny.blue-box.net (8.10.1/8.10.1/BBMX) with ESMTP id e3O2uQR81742; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 19:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 19:56:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Vince Valenti To: Will Andrews Cc: Chuck Robey , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syslog-ng In-Reply-To: <20000423184944.W6549@argon.blackdawn.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 06:17:07PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > > I'm late on commenting here (holiday stuff), but if you're actually going > > to use this, as opposed to merely making the port, you'd be very well > > advised to go look at nsyslog, which has all the stuff as syslog-ng, I > > think, plus more. I don't think syslog-ng has any options as to > > encrypting or signing log entries, it's just got an added grep, > > right? nsyslog has both features. > > Is there some reason why we can't have both? It's been a busy Easter weekend for me... I'll be submitting the syslog-ng port later tonight... I'd be more than happy to do the port for nsyslog as well, if nobody else has already started... -- Vince Valenti Network Services BendNet To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message