From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Mar 31 20:21:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C2F26AA85; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48sLLs2zyJz3Nmq; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:21:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1185) id 0BD025EA4; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:20:38 +0000 From: Rene Ladan To: Li-Wen Hsu Cc: ports-committers , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r529986 - in head: audio/supercollider graphics/drm-kmod graphics/gpu-firmware-kmod graphics/rawtherapee net-mgmt/kapacitor net-mgmt/kapacitor/files net/bnxt-kmod net/ceph13 net/ceph14 ... Message-ID: <20200331202038.GA95323@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <202003311615.02VGFHkW008151@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:21:11 -0000 On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:48:09AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:15 AM Rene Ladan wrote: > > X-Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24211 > > I am afraid that this field might not trigger Phabricator to > automatically close the differential, "Differential Revision:" should > be enough. Or is there any special reason to not to trigger it > intentionally? > Yes, because emulators/mesen was left out for now because it does not build on 11.3, I decided to keep the review open. René