Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:07:56 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Gea-Suan Lin <gslin@gslin.org>,freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Drop maintainership for all ports maintained by gslin@gslin.org Message-ID: <c67a8399-ee8a-4392-9fc7-b0bc20ddd719@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <20140630023714.GA32083@gslin.org> References: <20140630023714.GA32083@gslin.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30=2E Juni 2014 04:37:14 MESZ, Gea-Suan Lin <gslin@gslin=2Eorg> wrote: >Hello sir, > >I would like to drop all ports maintainship, please reset to ports@ >and perl@ (or other alias)=2E > >Thanks, > >--=20 > Resistance is futile=2E > http://blog=2Egslin=2Eorg/ & <gslin@gslin=2Eor= g> >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-ports@freebsd=2Eorg mailing list >http://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd=2Eorg" I will grab the databases/db* ports later=2E From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 07:51:20 2014 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E04E5A; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critical.ch (critical.ch [IPv6:2a01:4f8:100:936f::1:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71CE28B3; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wiggles.local (27-98.1-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.1.98.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by critical.ch (8.14.7/8.14.7/critical-1.0) with ESMTP id s5U7pGsF032807; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:51:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:51:16 +0200 From: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> To: Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> Subject: Re: rsync 3.1.1 zlib might not work Message-Id: <20140630095116.2900595e7c7667cc6c8af370@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53AE17B4.9020109@heuristicsystems.com.au> References: <CAHT8kSTAmd16YA8AUE4f44y3XJ5QYy-377v5w31XyVx+pQ0dfw@mail.gmail.com> <20140627145527.9d22938908a9f4847ba62388@FreeBSD.org> <53AE17B4.9020109@heuristicsystems.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Ben Tung <benpptung@tacol.biz>, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:51:20 -0000 Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> wrote: > Emanuel, > Thanks for bringing to our attention, I transmit ~900MB of backups > over the WAN rather than the uncompressed 9G database. You've saved > a client excess use charges. > > I tested using highly compressible data (mostly nulls) and it seems to > work as expected. > > Without -z or -zz: Sent 593 bytes speadup 0.82 > With -z : Sent 593 bytes speadup 0.82 (Unexpected. Should be in > ports/UPDATING) > With -zz: sent 85 bytes speedup is 4.27 (Expected) > > Detail > # rm ./b && printf "%512c"a > a && rsync -av ./a ./b > sending incremental file list > a > > sent 593 bytes received 35 bytes 1,256.00 bytes/sec > total size is 512 speedup is 0.82 > > # rm ./b && printf "%512c"a > a && rsync -avz ./a ./b > This rsync lacks old-style --compress due to its external zlib. Try > -zz. Continuing without compression. > > sending incremental file list > a > > sent 593 bytes received 35 bytes 1,256.00 bytes/sec > total size is 512 speedup is 0.82 > > # rm ./b && printf "%512c"a > a && rsync -avzz ./a ./b > sending incremental file list > a > > sent 85 bytes received 35 bytes 240.00 bytes/sec > total size is 512 speedup is 4.27 > > # ldd `which rsync` > /usr/local/bin/rsync: > libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x800873000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800a87000) > > Perhaps ports/UPDATING should alert users to the new requirement to > use -zz (not in man page) instead of -z or --compress? Indeed there seems to be some sort of confusion on how to use -z vs. -zz. However there -zz mentioned in the manpage of 3.1.1: -z, --compress With this option, rsync compresses the file data as it is sent to the destination machine, which reduces the amount of data being transmitted -- something that is useful over a slow con- nection. Note that this option typically achieves better compression ratios than can be achieved by using a compressing remote shell or a compressing transport because it takes advantage of the implicit information in the matching data blocks that are not explicitly sent over the connection. This matching-data com- pression comes at a cost of CPU, though, and can be disabled by repeating the -z option, but only if both sides are at least version 3.1.1. Note that if your version of rsync was compiled with an external zlib (instead of the zlib that comes packaged with rsync) then it will not support the old-style compression, only the new-style (repeated-option) compression. In the future this new-style compression will likely become the default. The client rsync requests new-style compression on the server via the --new-compress option, so if you see that option rejected it means that the server is not new enough to support -zz. Rsync also accepts the --old-compress option for a future time when new-style compression becomes the default. See the --skip-compress option for the default list of file suf- fixes that will not be compressed. This is currently being tracked under: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 I'm considering an UPDATED entry after some other issues with the port have been resolved. Emanuel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c67a8399-ee8a-4392-9fc7-b0bc20ddd719>