From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Apr 2 23:38:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de [194.138.37.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CA137BD75 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 23:38:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) Received: from mail2.siemens.de (mail2.siemens.de [139.25.208.11]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e336c8t22945 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:38:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mail2.siemens.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e336c7313888 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:38:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA07238 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:38:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:38:05 +0200 From: Andre Albsmeier To: Martin Cracauer Cc: Andre Albsmeier , FreeBSD emulation , marcel@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux_base 6.1 may work now Message-ID: <20000403083805.A16476@internal> References: <14538.64168.213977.432746@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20000311235754.A5556@stat.Duke.EDU> <20000312154020.A486@internal> <20000313083137.A25830@cons.org> <20000402145454.A64658@internal> <20000403081745.A4136@cons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000403081745.A4136@cons.org>; from cracauer@cons.org on Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 08:17:46AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 03-Apr-2000 at 08:17:46 +0200, Martin Cracauer wrote: > In <20000402145454.A64658@internal>, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > On Mon, 13-Mar-2000 at 08:31:38 +0100, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > > > > > There was a commit yesterday which may have fixed the linux problem. > > > > > > I don't have an x86 handy to play with -- can you see if it makes > > > > > > splus et al run with linux_base 6.1? > > > > > > [my commit] > > > > > > Change the default FPU control word so that exceptions for new > > > > > > processes are now masked until set by fpsetmask(3). > > > > > > > > > > Confirmed for -STABLE with acroread 4.05! > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > I am surprised that this affected the Linux emulator. > > > > > > Emulators should set the default FPU control word to what the native > > > kernel would, they should not inherit this value from the one that > > > FreeBSD assigns to its native processes. > > > > > > Although FreeBSD-4.0 now defaults to what Linux and Solaris expect, > > > this should be fixed in the Linux and Solaris emulators. Because the > > > FreeBSD control word may still be set to the old value by users and/or > > > a dynamic scheme for FreeBSD processes may be implemented. > > > > > > Is a person who feels responsible for the svr4 emulator on the CC: list > > > of this message? > > > > I would like to raise this subject again. Would it be any problem > > to commit the changes to sys/i386/include/npx.h to 3-STABLE as well? > > I have tried there and it makes acroread 4.05 work... > > I'm surprised the emulator maintainers didn't respond to this... So do I :-) > > I don't plan to change the default FPU control word in the 3.x branch, > because it is a too surprising behaviour change for a -STABLE and 3.x > is dead anyway (the latter implies that I am just killing my last 3.x > machine I could test this on). I don't think the other > FPU-interestedt people think different. > > The matter is also a bit more complicated for the Linux emulator since > different versions of libc/kernel combinations do different FPU cw > initialization. I see. Thanks anyway, -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message