From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 24 14:03:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: java@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B67616A41B for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ernst@ernstdehaan.com) Received: from spaceymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-207.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A1013C46C for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ernst@ernstdehaan.com) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (dsl-083-247-122-068.solcon.nl [83.247.122.68]) by spaceymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9D019502D; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:03:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46A605E5.2000403@delphij.net> References: <8FCFAB0D-691F-4FB5-885E-2FA0464DE536@ernstdehaan.com> <46A605E5.2000403@delphij.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <86C2D249-0B99-4750-AFA7-31BE9C8FEA65@ernstdehaan.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ernst de Haan Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:07:36 +0200 To: Xin LI X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removal of www/jakarta-tomcat4 and www/jakarta-tomcat5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:03:29 -0000 Xin, >> Is there any objection against removal of these ports: >> www/jakarta-tomcat4 >> www/jakarta-tomcat5 >> They not only employ an old naming scheme (Tomcat no longer falls >> under Jakarta), but they also seem to be outdated. > > Sounds reasonable to me. A simple grep over INDEX shows that > extsm-1.0_1 (www/extsm) depends on jakarta-tomcat5, though, so we > should take these into account. Good thinking. While doing some research I found that there are loads of security issues with the 4.0.x port anyway: http://tomcat.apache.org/security-4.html So IMHO the 4.0.x port should be abandoned ASAP. Ernst