From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 7 03:17:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4024516A4CE; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 03:17:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA8343D39; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 03:17:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08055; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:17:00 -0600 (MDT) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.2.20040806211621.0915da18@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.1.1 Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 21:17:01 -0600 To: "Matt Emmerton" , "Jorn Argelo" , From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <003401c47c2b$8434d770$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> References: <6.1.1.1.2.20040805205738.08e15630@localhost> <200408061022.11150.jorn@wcborstel.nl> <003401c47c2b$8434d770$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does the AMD64 version of FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 03:17:15 -0000 At 09:06 PM 8/6/2004, Matt Emmerton wrote: >While Intel (or AMD) may make changes to the underlying silicon to make >things better than their competitors (ie, larger caches, different pipeline >architecture, etc), they are committed to maintain compatibility between >AMD64 and EM64T. This is good to know. Has anyone tested the AMD64 version of FreeBSD on one of the Intel Xeons with the new instruction set? --Brett