From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 16 22:13:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D34A16A4CE; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:13:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shiva.nextrials.com (shiva.nextrials.com [64.81.74.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C2943D94; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:13:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dannyman@toldme.com) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (mito.sr.nextrials.com [192.168.1.102]) by shiva.nextrials.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEAA3C282A; Mon, 16 May 2005 15:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42891B05.3010107@toldme.com> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:13:25 -0700 From: Danny Howard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050418) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <20050514093217.C6088E082A@oak.tantieme.ru> <20050514131648.GB837@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <4200469905051406572de39b47@mail.gmail.com> <20050514141605.GC837@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <4200469905051407486f241a65@mail.gmail.com> <4d454d044d57b9f62c8dd51c3f077b38@ee.ryerson.ca> <20050514175855.GD837@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <20050514175855.GD837@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Vladimir Dzhivsanoff cc: David Magda cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gmirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:13:32 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:36:04AM -0400, David Magda wrote: >+> >+> On May 14, 2005, at 10:48, Vladimir Dzhivsanoff wrote: >+> >+> >On 5/14/05, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >+> >>There is my tool in ports (benchmarks/raidtest/) which does what you >+> >>want. >+> >>The README file wasn't moved to ports, IIRC, you can find it here: >+> >> >+> >big thanks, Pawel >+> >+> You may also want to check out Bonnie and Bonnie++. They're fairly >+> standard I/O benchmark programs that are a staple in measuring >+> performance. Bonnie is in the Ports tree. > >It measures file system performance, so it is basically not this level, >but could be useful too. > > > The desired result, in the end, is "filesystem performance" ... so if you can make a distinction between the various implementations you can implement, this is perhaps the most useful metric. -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/