From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 19 20:02:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832EE33D for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458381AF for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r2JK2t5m093866; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:02:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r2JK2t9s093863; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:02:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:02:55 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Ralf Mardorf Subject: Re: OT: Installing 9.1 without re-partitioning hard drive In-Reply-To: <1363620549.604.85.camel@archlinux> Message-ID: References: <20130317153744.DEQ57782@ms5.mc.surewest.net> <1363594543.1496.69.camel@archlinux> <1363620549.604.85.camel@archlinux> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:02:55 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:02:56 -0000 On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:00 -0600, Warren Block wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> Standard practice for this list is to Cc the responder and the list, >> because people are not required to subscribe to post. > > That makes sense and does explain why my last mail came through the > list, while my broken MUA didn't use the address, I used to subscribe to > this list. So a smarter MUA should provide different reply settings for > replying to different lists. I should take a look at the mailman > settings, since at the moment I receive 2 mails in case of Cc'ing, IIRC > this can be disabled. Mailing list settings may not help, since it's really up to the sender. But it's easy to filter out duplicates with maildrop or procmail.