From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Feb 22  4: 1:30 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC8210F49
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 04:01:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
          by dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id GAA11175 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 06:01:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: from sji-ca44-119.ix.netcom.com(209.111.212.247) by dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id rma011145; Mon Feb 22 06:01:09 1999
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.2/8.6.9) id DAA25746; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 03:59:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 03:59:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199902221159.DAA25746@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: http://advisor.gartner.com/n_inbox/hotcontent/hc_2121999_3.html
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

He's comparing pretty old versions (FreeBSD-2.2.6 vs. Linux kernel
2.0.34) but the method should be valid since he contends "FreeBSD
Provides the Best of Both Worlds". :)

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message