From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Nov 28 23:43:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750DE37B417; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:43:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAT7fqV52290; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:41:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Mike Smith Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anybody working on devd? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:15:53 PST." <200111282315.fASNFrA04958@mass.dis.org> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:41:52 +0100 Message-ID: <52288.1007019712@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200111282315.fASNFrA04958@mass.dis.org>, Mike Smith writes: >> >> If anyone has a better suggestion how to express the policy than >> by sticking rules like I proposed into the kernel from a userland >> program, I'm all ears... > >Like I proposed well over a year ago? 8) Yeah, I remember :-) Although you are not the first person to propose it to me, that honour goes to Billie Alsup at TFS way back in '96. Only recently have I come to accept it as the least evil option. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message