From owner-freebsd-alpha Wed Jun 20 14: 2:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EE337B401 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:02:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA18665; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:02:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.3/8.9.1) id f5KL1gq41163; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:01:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15153.3893.891927.381941@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:01:41 -0400 (EDT) To: Bosko Milekic Cc: Terry Lambert , freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vx, lge, nge, dc, rl, sf, sis, sk, vr, wb users please TEST In-Reply-To: <20010620143430.A35299@technokratis.com> References: <20010619191602.A28591@technokratis.com> <200106200224.TAA24251@usr05.primenet.com> <20010619232624.A29829@technokratis.com> <3B304ADF.C5131399@mindspring.com> <20010620123029.A34452@technokratis.com> <3B30D941.6AE93443@mindspring.com> <20010620135939.A34888@technokratis.com> <15152.59131.711800.873825@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20010620143430.A35299@technokratis.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Bosko Milekic writes: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:10:03PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Bosko Milekic writes: > > > > > > Before I go into this [the topic seems to have diverged a little], has > > > anybody gotten around to testing (or has the hardware to do the testing > > > required?) - if some of you guys are stuck with the fact that you have the > > > hardware but don't run -CURRENT, please let me know - I could generate an > > > equivalent patch for -STABLE, with a little work. > > > > I assume you're just looking for an unaligned access panic on the > > first bit of IP traffic? > > Yup. Well, I'm not looking for it, but if you catch it, it'll be a > sign that something's wrong. if_dc appears to work fine with your patch. BTW, it would be great if you posted your patches as CVS diffs... messing with patch -pX is something of a pain.. Cheers, Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message