From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 08:44:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108AF16A41F; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:44:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from fly.ebs.gr (dslcustomer-239-113.vivodi.gr [83.171.239.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4867743D49; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from ebs.gr (root@hal.ebs.gr [10.1.1.2]) by fly.ebs.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0J8i2AF000336; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:44:02 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from [10.1.1.158] (ajax.ebs.gr [10.1.1.158]) by ebs.gr (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0J8ishi056947; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:44:55 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Message-ID: <43CF5152.5000201@ebs.gr> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:44:02 +0200 From: Panagiotis Astithas Organization: EBS Ltd. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis References: <200601190400.k0J408wo050884@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200601190400.k0J408wo050884@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/91305: [patch] Fix the default build of java/eclipse X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:44:07 -0000 Greg Lewis wrote: > Synopsis: [patch] Fix the default build of java/eclipse > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-eclipse->glewis > Responsible-Changed-By: glewis > Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 19 03:58:49 UTC 2006 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > I'll take this. > > Panagiotis, this looks to me like it is worth a PORTREVISION bump. > How important is the missing library? Quite possibly, I usually defer the decision for PORTREVISION bumps to the committer. This library enables the internal browser widget and I've had one report from a user with this problem. Since it impacts the default configuration, I suppose a bump would make sure a correct package will get built from the ports cluster, too. Thanks, Panagiotis