From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 13 18: 1:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from tigger.nu.org (aglet6.zip.com.au [61.8.19.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FD337BDF5; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:01:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vance@nu.org) Received: by tigger.nu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D98B382; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:01:28 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:01:28 +1000 From: Christopher Vance To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ed driver 3-S -> 4-S Message-ID: <20000414110128.A12607@nu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have an old 386 running PicoBSD with a 3-STABLE kernel and an old ISA NE1000-type ethernet card successfully using the ed0 driver with non-standard irq and ports. M$WfW happily uses this card, too. I have compiled a 4-S kernel with the relevant irq and ports, and replaced the generic kernel on the 4.0-R boot.flp. When I boot to install 4-S on this system, the ed0 interface is present, marked not up, and has a MAC address of all zeros. It's present enough to allow me to set an inet address. Does anybody know of problems introduced into the ed driver in its move (presumably during work on 4-C)? It looks like I'll be running ddb soon... -- Christopher Vance To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message