From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 26 04:27:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E740106566C for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 04:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (cl-414.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:19d::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417578FC08 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 04:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (207.47.0.2.static.nextweb.net [207.47.0.2]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8F4908FC38; Thu, 26 May 2011 08:27:30 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E74C5C37; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 21:26:39 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov To: Steve Wills Message-Id: <20110525212639.18991589.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4DDCEDED.9030603@mouf.net> References: <4DD47A2B.8070905@mouf.net> <4DD583F0.7030308@p6m7g8.com> <4DDCEDED.9030603@mouf.net> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ruby 1.9 update patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 04:27:32 -0000 On Wed, 25 May 2011 07:54:21 -0400 Steve Wills mentioned: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thanks for the feedback! > > I was attempting to do some run time testing of this and stumbled upon a > strange issue. It seems that even without my patch (and with it too), if > you do this: > > cd /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb > env RUBY_VER=1.9 make install > > on a system without any ruby, it will install Ruby 1.9, then fail to > install the databases/ruby-bdb port since there will not be a "rdoc" > binary installed, but only "rdoc19". My patch doesn't make this worse, > but it doesn't help it either. Should I try to solve this and if so how? It should use ${RUBY_RDOC} instead of just calling rdoc directly. This way it will get the correct one. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments