From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jul 2 9:15:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw2.roguewave.com (fw2.roguewave.com [208.151.233.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C15715311 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:15:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carey@roguewave.com) Received: by fw2.roguewave.com; id RAA06300; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 17:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cvo1.cvo.roguewave.com(10.68.4.36) via SMTP by hub.FreeBSD.ORG, id smtpd006244; Fri Jul 2 17:19:29 1999 Received: by CVO1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:17:36 -0700 Message-ID: From: Woody Carey To: "'Theodore Hope'" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: 3com 3c905-B driver Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:17:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, it does. I am running 3.2 on a 3Com 3c905-B, which worked fine OOTB (GENERIC) kernel. You may have trouble with the second card, and have to do some kernel config and build to remove the conflicts due to two cards of the same type. Here is dmesg from my 905B: xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> rev 0x30 int a irq 17 on pci0.17.0 > We're about to install 3.2 on a box that has two 3com 3c905-B > (10/100) cards. I've looked through the mailing list archives and > have seen that the "vx" driver does not support the 3c905-B, only > the 3c905, and that for the 3c905-B one must use the "xl" driver found > in http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/3Com. Is this still the > case for 3.2, > or does 3.2 come with the xl driver built in? > > In other words, does 3.2 automatically recognize and support the > 3c905-B or do I have to add the other driver later? > > Thanks, -T. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message