From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 18:16:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A3D16A4B3 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 18:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-253.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A0343FA3 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 18:16:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC61166E08; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 18:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A810CB62; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 18:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 18:16:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kenny Freeman Message-ID: <20031010011640.GE10682@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030803200948.GA10712@lewiz.org> <200310091700.09658.kennyf@pchg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310091700.09658.kennyf@pchg.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: FreeBSD-questions cc: Lewis Thompson Subject: Re: Jail FS questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:16:53 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:16:53 -0000 --AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:00:02PM -0400, Kenny Freeman wrote: > > I've been reading about unionfs and nullfs (well, more skim reading > > really; I'm not FS guru, which is why I'm asking here) and one of these > > sounds like it could be the idea solution. At first glance I'd say that > > unionfs would be the way to go. Both unionfs and nullfs are documented to be broken. Seriously, those big scary warnings in the manpages are there for a reason! Having said that, some people have reported success in certain limited situations. If you insist on using them, then you're on your own if/when it breaks. This means: do not complain to us when your system crashes and you lose a filesystem. Kris --AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/hgh4Wry0BWjoQKURAlunAKDQ++qVxw7Z7gFiBfII9GRuARAglQCghzi/ CHuLIGuoMVOZO9fOgpygtdk= =NAdI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AsxXAMtlQ5JHofzM--