Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 13:35:26 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Gordon Bergling <gbergling@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Murray <markm@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BUG in libm's powf Message-ID: <20210906203526.GA88286@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <AAC47D81-C45E-45E0-A7F5-543BCBBA811F@gmail.com> References: <20210906152836.GA86615@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <01D81389-45D1-4278-8DC1-7995D34D0276@FreeBSD.org> <20210906175318.GA87474@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <AAA24AAD-86C5-4736-AD0C-EFBCA3FA59B2@FreeBSD.org> <20210906180459.GA87487@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <AAC47D81-C45E-45E0-A7F5-543BCBBA811F@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 10:22:02PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote: > could you turn to test program into an AFT test to prevent further regressions? > > —Gordon > I cannot tell if you are addressing Mark or me. For me, I know nothing about ATF. I do, however, suspect that this won't regress as I'm one of the few people who actually looks at threshold issues in libm. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210906203526.GA88286>